Similar providers
-
1inch
Web3 traders and decentralized finance participants seeking automated liquidity routing across multiple decentralized exchanges and EVM networks without custodial account requirements.
Compare with 1inch -
2gether
European retail users who historically sought everyday euro card spending backed directly by digital token balances within a regulated cooperative mobile application.
Compare with 2gether -
3Commas
Crypto traders seeking multi-exchange execution, automated DCA and Grid bots, customizable webhook signals, and unified portfolio monitoring across supported spot and derivatives markets.
Compare with 3Commas
Our take
Figment positions itself as a established technical bridge between complex proof-of-stake protocols and institutional balance sheets. By operating purely on a non-custodial model, the platform eliminates counterparty holding risk while running dedicated validator clusters across more than thirty networks including Ethereum, Solana, and Cosmos. For institutional asset allocators, the inclusion of SOC 2 Type II certifications, comprehensive rewards reporting, and enterprise slashing protections solves primary governance hurdles. However, the service is distinctly engineered for institutions, custodians, and corporate treasuries rather than retail stakers looking for instant liquid conversions or micro-allocation pools. Fee structures operate on custom institutional commission agreements rather than fixed public schedules, meaning prospective delegators must evaluate enterprise proposals directly. For organizations equipped to manage their own key custody and operational workflows, Figment provides dependable, auditable network infrastructure backed by experienced engineering support.
Pros and cons
Pros
- Non-custodial architecture keeps private keys and asset custody entirely under client control
- SOC 2 Type II certified operations with built-in slashing coverage policies and uptime is intended to support
- Comprehensive institutional reporting, rewards monitoring, and API integrations across dozens of networks
Cons
- Enterprise focus excludes low-balance retail users seeking simple turnkey interfaces
- Custom institutional pricing requires direct sales engagement rather than transparent flat fee tiers
- Clients remain exposed to underlying network unbonding rules, protocol lockups, and base slashing mechanisms
Validator Architecture and Network Coverage
Figment delivers staking-as-a-service infrastructure designed specifically for institutional asset managers, exchanges, custodians, and decentralized protocol foundations. The platform maintains active, monitored validator nodes across more than thirty leading proof-of-stake protocols, encompassing major networks such as Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, Avalanche, Near, and various Cosmos application chains. Organizations can deploy dedicated private validator nodes or direct delegations toward public enterprise clusters depending on balance size and architectural preferences.
Beyond standard bare-metal validator operations, Figment equips institutional engineering teams with developer tooling, including robust API endpoints and webhooks for automated staking, validator lifecycle tracking, and programmatic rewards harvesting. The Figment App serves as a centralized operational dashboard, offering institutional clients granular visibility into active stakes, historical reward distributions, commission deductions, and node uptime metrics across multi-chain portfolios.
For enterprise platforms embedding staking into consumer or custodial products, Figment acts as the underlying execution layer. Custody providers and financial institutions integrate Figment staking infrastructure directly into their existing custody environments without transferring control of funds, maintaining a clean technical separation between key storage and transaction validation.
Institutional Pricing, Commission Rates, and Yield Realization
Figment utilizes a protocol commission model where fees are typically deducted directly from gross on-chain staking rewards rather than invoiced as flat monthly infrastructure costs. Standard protocol commission rates vary across supported blockchains, reflecting individual network tokenomics, hardware requirements, and custom client volume tier agreements. For dedicated institutional validator clusters, customized fee agreements or software-as-a-service infrastructure fees may apply depending on technical configuration, custom service level agreements, and support requirements.
Because Figment does not custody digital assets, all principal deposits and generated staking rewards settle directly to client-controlled wallet addresses or whitelisted institutional custody accounts according to protocol rules. Figment does not apply proprietary withdrawal charges, spread markups, or liquidity exit penalties beyond native network transaction fees and protocol commission percentages agreed in enterprise contracts.
Yield realization timelines, unbonding schedules, and payout frequencies depend strictly on the underlying network protocol mechanics. For instance, Ethereum rewards distribute on-chain according to consensus rules, while networks like Cosmos or Polkadot enforce native unbonding windows ranging from two to four weeks. Stakers must account for these native blockchain rules when modeling portfolio liquidity.
Non-Custodial Architecture, Slashing Protection, and Audits
Security architecture at Figment centers strictly on non-custodial operations, ensuring that clients retain full ownership and administrative control over their cryptographic private keys and staking withdrawal credentials at all times. Figment operates validation nodes and signs blocks on behalf of delegators, but never maintains access to funds or holds authorization to transfer principal assets out of client-managed custody vaults.
To mitigate technical and operational vulnerabilities, Figment maintains independent SOC 2 Type II compliance and ISO 27001 certifications covering its infrastructure management and operational workflows. Node deployment utilizes distributed cloud and bare-metal environments across diverse geographical data centers, incorporating robust hardware security modules, multi-region failover, and active anti-DDoS mitigations to sustain high validator uptime and prevent double-signing events.
Figment provides commercial slashing coverage policies for eligible institutional clients, designed to protect against potential financial losses resulting from validator downtime penalties or accidental infrastructure errors. While these operational measures significantly diminish technical failure risks, delegators still operate within the broader regulatory and software failure risks inherent to public distributed consensus protocols.
Enterprise Support, Geographic Reach, and Compliance Frameworks
Headquartered in Canada and operating globally, Figment structures its products to comply with international enterprise standards, serving hedge funds, venture funds, registered investment advisers, public companies, and global fintech institutions. The company maintains strict enterprise onboarding workflows, executing standard Know Your Customer and anti-money laundering due diligence before provisioning dedicated validator infrastructure or enterprise API services.
Customer support for enterprise clients includes dedicated technical account managers, specialized integration engineers, and around-the-clock infrastructure monitoring. Service level agreements provide intended to provide response times, proactive incident notifications, and scheduled operational reviews, catering specifically to institutional expectations that standard retail community channels cannot satisfy.
Comprehensive tax and accounting support represents a core component of the platform. Figment provides downloadable, auditable reporting tools that export reward histories, cost-basis calculations, and protocol event logs in formats compatible with major institutional crypto accounting platforms, easing quarterly financial reporting and internal audit requirements for corporate treasuries.
Protocol Risks and Operational Boundaries
Delegating to Figment validators mitigates operational node failure risks through enterprise-grade DevOps, but it does not eliminate systemic blockchain network vulnerabilities. All proof-of-stake delegators remain exposed to smart contract bugs, sudden hard forks, and native protocol governance changes that could alter yield rates or unbonding periods. While Figment provides commercial slashing protections under qualified institutional contracts, such policies cover specific operational faults rather than market-wide asset depreciation or underlying blockchain consensus failures.
Organizations must evaluate native protocol lockup schedules and liquidity constraints before allocating balance sheet capital. Figment maintains redundant failover infrastructure and continuous monitoring to prevent validator double-signing and downtime penalties, yet market participants should account for protocol-level slashing conditions that arise from broader decentralized network events outside validator operational control.
Delegation Models: Public Nodes Versus Dedicated Infrastructure
Clients engaging Figment can choose between delegating directly to Figment public validator addresses or deploying dedicated, single-tenant validator nodes. Delegating to public validators allows institutions to activate staking quickly across multiple assets with minimal technical overhead, paying standard commission rates deducted from rewards. Dedicated nodes cater to larger asset managers requiring bespoke operational rules, custom MEV extraction policies, zero-commission internal routing, or specific geographic validator placement to satisfy internal compliance standards.
Choosing the appropriate architecture depends on an organization's balance sheet size, regulatory parameters, and developer integration capabilities. High-volume funds often prefer dedicated infrastructure to maintain isolated signer authority and tailored uptime SLAs, whereas multi-asset treasuries may utilize shared validator infrastructure across dozens of supported ecosystems simultaneously without configuring unique hardware nodes.
Who it suits
Figment is tailored for institutional market participants, including venture capital funds, corporate treasury managers, digital asset custodians, and fintech builders requiring SOC 2 compliant staking infrastructure across diversified proof-of-stake networks. It fits organizations that already maintain robust self-custody or qualified custodian accounts and require programmatic API management without surrendering custody of cryptographic keys.
Retail individuals with small token balances or users seeking high-frequency liquid staking swaps will find the direct enterprise engagement model and custom pricing structure unnecessary compared to automated consumer staking platforms.
Frequently asked questions
Does Figment take custody of staked crypto assets?+
No, Figment operates on an entirely non-custodial model. Clients retain sole control over their private keys, withdrawal credentials, and principal balances within their own institutional custody solutions or self-managed wallets, delegating only validation signing authority to Figment infrastructure.
How are staking fees structured on Figment?+
Figment typically charges a protocol commission percentage deducted directly from earned staking rewards. For dedicated infrastructure deployments or complex API integrations, custom enterprise pricing and service level agreements apply based on portfolio volume and technical requirements.
What networks does Figment support for validator staking?+
Figment supports over thirty proof-of-stake networks across major layer-one and layer-two ecosystems. Supported assets include Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Polkadot, Near, Polygon, and several prominent Cosmos chains. Infrastructure engineering teams continuously evaluate emerging blockchain protocols for inclusion, expanding validator availability based on institutional client demand and technical maturity.
Does Figment offer slashing protection?+
Yes, Figment provides commercial slashing coverage policies for qualified institutional clients. This coverage is designed to compensate delegators in the event of validator downtime penalties or operational infrastructure errors resulting in on-chain slashing events.
Can retail users stake directly with Figment?+
Retail token holders can delegate their assets to Figment public validator addresses via supported non-custodial wallets on various networks, but direct enterprise dashboard access, custom dedicated nodes, and API support are reserved for institutional clients.
What security compliance certifications does Figment hold?+
Figment maintains independent SOC 2 Type II compliance and ISO 27001 certifications. These institutional standards validate internal control mechanisms, physical and cloud data security practices, and reliable DevOps workflows. Regular third-party audits helps support ongoing adherence to strict risk mitigation frameworks across global infrastructure deployments.
How do clients monitor staking rewards and generate tax reports?+
Clients utilize the Figment App and institutional APIs to monitor validator performance, rewards accrual, and commission deductions. The reporting suite offers granular transaction records and auditable data streams. Organizations can export these structured reports directly into institutional accounting software and enterprise tax preparation systems.
What happens during blockchain unbonding periods?+
During native protocol unbonding windows, staked tokens cease earning rewards and remain locked until the network timeframe expires. These holding periods are enforced directly by underlying blockchain consensus rules. Figment does not control these unbonding durations and cannot accelerate asset withdrawal release timelines.
Visit the Figment website
Review current terms, availability, and eligibility on the provider's website before continuing.