Skip to content
HodlCue

Head-to-head

Awaken vs Figment

Awaken

Active decentralized finance participants, NFT collectors, and Web3 power users who require automated on-chain transaction interpretation and IRS capital gains reporting.

8.50
vs
Higher editorial review rating

Figment

Asset managers, crypto custodians, exchanges, and institutional investors seeking non-custodial validator infrastructure with SOC 2 compliance and API-driven staking management.

8.70
  • Figment has a higher editorial review rating than Awaken.

Our take

Awaken

Awaken establishes a focused position within the crypto accounting landscape by concentrating specifically on decentralized finance complexity. Unlike traditional cryptocurrency tax calculators that struggle with multi-step liquidity provisioning, staking derivative routing, or NFT contract interactions, Awaken applies automated parsing models to interpret raw smart contract execution data into standardized tax lots.

The platform delivers reliable cost basis tracking, capital gain calculations, and standard United States regulatory exports including Form 8949 and Schedule D summaries. The software remains non-custodial and operates strictly through read-only wallet addresses and read-only exchange API keys. Users with extensive automated market maker trades or multi-chain protocol engagements will find the workflow efficient, although accounts with large transaction volumes will need to budget for higher tiered annual subscriptions.

Figment

Figment positions itself as a established technical bridge between complex proof-of-stake protocols and institutional balance sheets. By operating purely on a non-custodial model, the platform eliminates counterparty holding risk while running dedicated validator clusters across more than thirty networks including Ethereum, Solana, and Cosmos. For institutional asset allocators, the inclusion of SOC 2 Type II certifications, comprehensive rewards reporting, and enterprise slashing protections solves primary governance hurdles. However, the service is distinctly engineered for institutions, custodians, and corporate treasuries rather than retail stakers looking for instant liquid conversions or micro-allocation pools. Fee structures operate on custom institutional commission agreements rather than fixed public schedules, meaning prospective delegators must evaluate enterprise proposals directly. For organizations equipped to manage their own key custody and operational workflows, Figment provides dependable, auditable network infrastructure backed by experienced engineering support.

Pros and cons

Awaken

Pros

  • Specialized machine learning categorization for complex DeFi and smart contract interactions across major EVM chains.
  • Integrated portfolio overview with read-only wallet sync and detailed cost basis adjustments.
  • Clear Form 8949 and Schedule D export capabilities formatted for United States tax filing requirements.

Cons

  • Tiered pricing based on total annual transaction volume can escalate for high-frequency on-chain traders.
  • Native protocol coverage varies outside EVM-compatible ecosystems, requiring manual CSV adjustments for non-standard transactions.

Figment

Pros

  • Non-custodial architecture keeps private keys and asset custody entirely under client control
  • SOC 2 Type II certified operations with built-in slashing coverage policies and uptime is intended to support
  • Comprehensive institutional reporting, rewards monitoring, and API integrations across dozens of networks

Cons

  • Enterprise focus excludes low-balance retail users seeking simple turnkey interfaces
  • Custom institutional pricing requires direct sales engagement rather than transparent flat fee tiers
  • Clients remain exposed to underlying network unbonding rules, protocol lockups, and base slashing mechanisms

DeFi parsing and multi-chain accounting capabilities

Awaken

Awaken operates as a dedicated Web3 tax calculation and portfolio aggregation tool designed to reconcile on-chain ledger entries with statutory accounting rules. The platform focuses heavily on Ethereum, layer-2 rollups, and EVM networks, analyzing internal transactions, wrapped token swaps, gas expenditure deductibility, and yield harvests that standard exchange-focused tools frequently mischaracterize.

When public wallet addresses are connected, Awaken scans historical smart contract executions to categorize activities into transfers, trades, income, collateral deposits, and capital losses. The tool maps liquidity pool tokens, bridge movements across compatible chains, and staking contract rewards into clear tax lots using standard methods such as FIFO, LIFO, and HIFO accounting rules.

For centralized activity, users can integrate read-only exchange API connections or upload standard CSV statements. While the software excels at on-chain decoding, specialized or niche non-EVM protocols may occasionally require manual transaction adjustments or custom classification tagging to helps support accurate basis preservation.

Figment

Figment delivers staking-as-a-service infrastructure designed specifically for institutional asset managers, exchanges, custodians, and decentralized protocol foundations. The platform maintains active, monitored validator nodes across more than thirty leading proof-of-stake protocols, encompassing major networks such as Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, Avalanche, Near, and various Cosmos application chains. Organizations can deploy dedicated private validator nodes or direct delegations toward public enterprise clusters depending on balance size and architectural preferences.

Beyond standard bare-metal validator operations, Figment equips institutional engineering teams with developer tooling, including robust API endpoints and webhooks for automated staking, validator lifecycle tracking, and programmatic rewards harvesting. The Figment App serves as a centralized operational dashboard, offering institutional clients granular visibility into active stakes, historical reward distributions, commission deductions, and node uptime metrics across multi-chain portfolios.

For enterprise platforms embedding staking into consumer or custodial products, Figment acts as the underlying execution layer. Custody providers and financial institutions integrate Figment staking infrastructure directly into their existing custody environments without transferring control of funds, maintaining a clean technical separation between key storage and transaction validation.

Subscription pricing tiers and volume-based models

Awaken

Awaken utilizes a tiered annual software subscription model structured primarily around total transaction counts per tax year. Basic plans cater to casual users with limited annual trades, while higher tier tiers accommodate active decentralized finance operators running thousands of liquidity, lending, and yield farming transactions.

Users can connect public wallet addresses and preview raw transaction ingestion without upfront payment, allowing an initial assessment of how accurately the engine categorizes historical activity before purchasing a report export package. Generating final tax documentation, downloadable Form 8949 PDFs, TurboTax-compatible CSV files, or accountant-ready ledger summaries requires a paid plan appropriate for that filing year's transaction bracket.

Because Awaken is pure accounting software rather than a financial brokerage or custodial wallet, it does not charge transaction spreads, execution commissions, or asset withdrawal fees. Pricing reflects direct software licensing, and annual subscriptions must be renewed for each specific tax year requiring formal calculation and reporting.

Figment

Figment utilizes a protocol commission model where fees are typically deducted directly from gross on-chain staking rewards rather than invoiced as flat monthly infrastructure costs. Standard protocol commission rates vary across supported blockchains, reflecting individual network tokenomics, hardware requirements, and custom client volume tier agreements. For dedicated institutional validator clusters, customized fee agreements or software-as-a-service infrastructure fees may apply depending on technical configuration, custom service level agreements, and support requirements.

Because Figment does not custody digital assets, all principal deposits and generated staking rewards settle directly to client-controlled wallet addresses or whitelisted institutional custody accounts according to protocol rules. Figment does not apply proprietary withdrawal charges, spread markups, or liquidity exit penalties beyond native network transaction fees and protocol commission percentages agreed in enterprise contracts.

Yield realization timelines, unbonding schedules, and payout frequencies depend strictly on the underlying network protocol mechanics. For instance, Ethereum rewards distribute on-chain according to consensus rules, while networks like Cosmos or Polkadot enforce native unbonding windows ranging from two to four weeks. Stakers must account for these native blockchain rules when modeling portfolio liquidity.

Non-custodial architecture and data privacy controls

Awaken

Awaken maintains a non-custodial operating architecture across all supported blockchain networks and exchange integrations. The platform never requests private keys, recovery seed phrases, or withdrawal permissions from connected accounts. Wallet synchronization is executed entirely via public blockchain addresses, scanning publicly available ledger data to reconstruct user transaction histories and contract interactions. When connecting centralized cryptocurrency exchanges, Awaken requires read-only API credentials, preventing external trade execution or capital movements during data synchronization.

Account authentication incorporates standard encryption standards, and user data is processed through secured cloud infrastructure designed to separate sensitive tax identity details from on-chain public addresses. While the non-custodial design eliminates direct asset custody risks, users remain responsible for securing their account login credentials, reviewing shared address sets, and maintaining secondary records of their historical activity. Platform security measures protect data in transit and at rest, but they do not eliminate the necessity for personal operational security when handling financial documentation and sensitive tax filings.

Figment

Security architecture at Figment centers strictly on non-custodial operations, ensuring that clients retain full ownership and administrative control over their cryptographic private keys and staking withdrawal credentials at all times. Figment operates validation nodes and signs blocks on behalf of delegators, but never maintains access to funds or holds authorization to transfer principal assets out of client-managed custody vaults.

To mitigate technical and operational vulnerabilities, Figment maintains independent SOC 2 Type II compliance and ISO 27001 certifications covering its infrastructure management and operational workflows. Node deployment utilizes distributed cloud and bare-metal environments across diverse geographical data centers, incorporating robust hardware security modules, multi-region failover, and active anti-DDoS mitigations to sustain high validator uptime and prevent double-signing events.

Figment provides commercial slashing coverage policies for eligible institutional clients, designed to protect against potential financial losses resulting from validator downtime penalties or accidental infrastructure errors. While these operational measures significantly diminish technical failure risks, delegators still operate within the broader regulatory and software failure risks inherent to public distributed consensus protocols.

Jurisdictional reporting rules and support infrastructure

Awaken

Awaken is headquartered in the United States and is optimized primarily for United States Internal Revenue Service tax guidelines, including short-term versus long-term capital gain treatment, ordinary income categorization for staking rewards, and Form 8949 structural alignment. However, because cost basis calculation rules like FIFO and HIFO apply broadly, users in other tax jurisdictions can also utilize the underlying export data.

The platform provides self-directed documentation, user guides explaining DeFi tax mechanics, and in-app customer support channels for technical transaction resolution. When novel protocols create ambiguous transaction traces, users can submit categorization questions to the support team or manually reclassify transactions directly inside the platform interface.

Awaken provides mathematical aggregation and reporting tools rather than individual legal, financial, or tax advice. Users must evaluate their filings with a qualified tax professional to confirm local compliance, particularly regarding nuanced rules surrounding liquidity pool yields, wrapping transactions, and hard forks.

Figment

Headquartered in Canada and operating globally, Figment structures its products to comply with international enterprise standards, serving hedge funds, venture funds, registered investment advisers, public companies, and global fintech institutions. The company maintains strict enterprise onboarding workflows, executing standard Know Your Customer and anti-money laundering due diligence before provisioning dedicated validator infrastructure or enterprise API services.

Customer support for enterprise clients includes dedicated technical account managers, specialized integration engineers, and around-the-clock infrastructure monitoring. Service level agreements provide intended to provide response times, proactive incident notifications, and scheduled operational reviews, catering specifically to institutional expectations that standard retail community channels cannot satisfy.

Comprehensive tax and accounting support represents a core component of the platform. Figment provides downloadable, auditable reporting tools that export reward histories, cost-basis calculations, and protocol event logs in formats compatible with major institutional crypto accounting platforms, easing quarterly financial reporting and internal audit requirements for corporate treasuries.

Selecting the appropriate filing plan and tier

Awaken

Choosing an appropriate Awaken plan depends directly on overall annual transaction volume and the specific networks used across your portfolio. Users can initially connect their active public wallet addresses and centralized exchange accounts to review the total imported transaction count across all active tax years before committing to a paid tier. Awaken structures its filing tiers to accommodate casual investors, moderate crypto traders, and high-frequency decentralized finance participants with thousands of on-chain interactions. Evaluating your historical smart contract activity, liquidity pool entries, and bridging actions beforehand allows you to select a plan that fully covers every taxable event. This proactive approach supports the seamless generation of complete tax reports without running into mid-process transaction limits or unexpected mid-tier upgrades during annual filing.

Figment

Clients engaging Figment can choose between delegating directly to Figment public validator addresses or deploying dedicated, single-tenant validator nodes. Delegating to public validators allows institutions to activate staking quickly across multiple assets with minimal technical overhead, paying standard commission rates deducted from rewards. Dedicated nodes cater to larger asset managers requiring bespoke operational rules, custom MEV extraction policies, zero-commission internal routing, or specific geographic validator placement to satisfy internal compliance standards.

Choosing the appropriate architecture depends on an organization's balance sheet size, regulatory parameters, and developer integration capabilities. High-volume funds often prefer dedicated infrastructure to maintain isolated signer authority and tailored uptime SLAs, whereas multi-asset treasuries may utilize shared validator infrastructure across dozens of supported ecosystems simultaneously without configuring unique hardware nodes.

Data accuracy considerations and manual reconciliations

Awaken

Automated smart contract interpretation carries inherent complexity due to the continuous deployment of custom contracts, liquidity mechanisms, and multi-hop routing protocols across various decentralized finance ecosystems. While parsing algorithms automatically categorize the vast majority of standard transfers, swaps, and token stakes, non-standard transactions such as multi-asset bridge events or flash loans can occasionally result in missing cost basis entries or unlinked internal transfers. Awaken provides automated warning flags for missing basis calculations, orphaned withdrawals, and duplicate records, allowing users to manually inspect and reclassify individual entries. Utilizing the built-in manual editing tools before exporting final Form 8949 schedules enables filers to correct discrepancies, resolve unaccounted asset movements, and align their reported calculations with personal transaction logs and original exchange records.

Figment

Delegating to Figment validators mitigates operational node failure risks through enterprise-grade DevOps, but it does not eliminate systemic blockchain network vulnerabilities. All proof-of-stake delegators remain exposed to smart contract bugs, sudden hard forks, and native protocol governance changes that could alter yield rates or unbonding periods. While Figment provides commercial slashing protections under qualified institutional contracts, such policies cover specific operational faults rather than market-wide asset depreciation or underlying blockchain consensus failures.

Organizations must evaluate native protocol lockup schedules and liquidity constraints before allocating balance sheet capital. Figment maintains redundant failover infrastructure and continuous monitoring to prevent validator double-signing and downtime penalties, yet market participants should account for protocol-level slashing conditions that arise from broader decentralized network events outside validator operational control.

Who it suits

Awaken

Awaken is best suited for decentralized finance participants, active NFT collectors, and Web3 power users who require automated on-chain transaction interpretation and IRS capital gains reporting. Investors operating across multiple non-custodial wallets will benefit from its smart contract parsing capabilities that decode multi-hop interactions. The platform fits traders needing reliable cost basis calculations across liquidity pools, token swaps, and yield farming protocols. However, individuals holding simple buy-and-hold spot portfolios on a single centralized exchange may find dedicated DeFi tooling more comprehensive than their straightforward tax reporting needs require. It serves taxpayers who want structured Form 8949 exports alongside custom transaction editing features.

Figment

Figment is tailored for institutional market participants, including venture capital funds, corporate treasury managers, digital asset custodians, and fintech builders requiring SOC 2 compliant staking infrastructure across diversified proof-of-stake networks. It fits organizations that already maintain robust self-custody or qualified custodian accounts and require programmatic API management without surrendering custody of cryptographic keys.

Retail individuals with small token balances or users seeking high-frequency liquid staking swaps will find the direct enterprise engagement model and custom pricing structure unnecessary compared to automated consumer staking platforms.

Awaken

Figment

Awaken

Awaken is specialized crypto tax software built for complex on-chain DeFi activity, automatic smart contract transaction labeling, multi-wallet tracking, and IRS-compliant Form 8949 report generation.

Figment

Figment operates enterprise-grade, non-custodial staking infrastructure across major proof-of-stake networks. It delivers SOC 2 certified validator operations, institutional reporting, and API integrations for asset managers, custodians, and fintech …

Other matchups

  • Compare
  • Compare
  • Compare
  • Compare
  • Compare
  • Compare

Not the right match?

Line up any two providers side by side, or browse the full list to find your next provider.