Skip to content
HodlCue

Head-to-head

Ankr vs Figment

8.20
  • Supports liquid staking across diverse networks including Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, and Avalanche.
  • Issues reward-bearing liquid staking tokens that can be transferred across decentralized finance applications.
  • Integrates extensive Web3 developer infrastructure, RPC nodes, and validator network services.
vs
8.70
  • Non-custodial architecture keeps private keys and asset custody entirely under client control
  • SOC 2 Type II certified operations with built-in slashing coverage policies and uptime is intended to support
  • Comprehensive institutional reporting, rewards monitoring, and API integrations across dozens of networks
  • Ankr for Crypto holders and developers seeking multi-chain liquid staking receipts across networks like Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Avalanche without running dedicated validator nodes.; Figment for Asset managers, crypto custodians, exchanges, and institutional investors seeking non-custodial validator infrastructure with SOC 2 compliance and API-driven staking management..

See the category overview

Ankr vs Figment
FeatureAnkrFigment
Overall rating8.208.70
Best forCrypto holders and developers seeking multi-chain liquid staking receipts across networks like Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Avalanche without running dedicated validator nodes.Asset managers, crypto custodians, exchanges, and institutional investors seeking non-custodial validator infrastructure with SOC 2 compliance and API-driven staking management.
Primary familyliquid-stakingearn
Maker/taker feeNot recordedNot recorded
Supported coinsNot recordedNot recorded
KYC requiredNot recordedNot recorded

Our take

Ankr

Ankr stands out as an established multi-chain infrastructure and liquid staking provider. Founded in 2017, the protocol bridges the gap between decentralized node operations and accessible staking tokens. Instead of locking assets directly on native proof of stake blockchains where capital remains illiquid, participants receive liquid staking tokens like ankrETH or ankrBNB. These synthetic receipts automatically accrue consensus layer rewards or rebase in value while remaining usable throughout decentralized finance applications.

However, liquid staking introduces operational tradeoffs that self-custodial solo staking avoids. Users must navigate smart contract vulnerabilities, slashing exposure across distributed node operators, and protocol fee deductions deducted directly from gross returns. Ankr provides functional flexibility for active decentralized finance participants, but it requires comfort with non-custodial wallet interactions and composable smart contract risk.

Figment

Figment positions itself as a established technical bridge between complex proof-of-stake protocols and institutional balance sheets. By operating purely on a non-custodial model, the platform eliminates counterparty holding risk while running dedicated validator clusters across more than thirty networks including Ethereum, Solana, and Cosmos. For institutional asset allocators, the inclusion of SOC 2 Type II certifications, comprehensive rewards reporting, and enterprise slashing protections solves primary governance hurdles. However, the service is distinctly engineered for institutions, custodians, and corporate treasuries rather than retail stakers looking for instant liquid conversions or micro-allocation pools. Fee structures operate on custom institutional commission agreements rather than fixed public schedules, meaning prospective delegators must evaluate enterprise proposals directly. For organizations equipped to manage their own key custody and operational workflows, Figment provides dependable, auditable network infrastructure backed by experienced engineering support.

Pros and cons

Ankr

Pros

  • Supports liquid staking across diverse networks including Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, and Avalanche.
  • Issues reward-bearing liquid staking tokens that can be transferred across decentralized finance applications.
  • Integrates extensive Web3 developer infrastructure, RPC nodes, and validator network services.

Cons

  • Deducts protocol commissions directly from gross staking rewards prior to distribution.
  • Carries inherent smart contract exposure, bridge dependencies, and potential slashing risks across multiple chains.
  • Relies on decentralized community forums and ticketing rather than dedicated retail phone support.

Figment

Pros

  • Non-custodial architecture keeps private keys and asset custody entirely under client control
  • SOC 2 Type II certified operations with built-in slashing coverage policies and uptime is intended to support
  • Comprehensive institutional reporting, rewards monitoring, and API integrations across dozens of networks

Cons

  • Enterprise focus excludes low-balance retail users seeking simple turnkey interfaces
  • Custom institutional pricing requires direct sales engagement rather than transparent flat fee tiers
  • Clients remain exposed to underlying network unbonding rules, protocol lockups, and base slashing mechanisms

Liquid staking architecture and supported networks

Ankr

Ankr operates as a decentralized infrastructure protocol that connects token holders with distributed validator networks. Unlike single-chain staking pools, Ankr provides liquid staking mechanisms across a diverse array of major layer 1 and layer 2 blockchains. Supported assets traditionally include Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, Avalanche, and Fantom, allowing users to deposit native tokens into designated smart contracts.

Upon depositing native assets, users receive liquid staking tokens that represent their underlying deposit plus accumulated staking yield. These tokens utilize either reward-bearing models where the redemption value increases relative to the underlying asset, or rebasing mechanics that adjust account balances periodically. Beyond retail staking interfaces, Ankr operates an extensive remote procedure call network and developer suite. This dual positioning allows the protocol to route validator traffic through its proprietary node infrastructure, maintaining operational uptime while supporting Web3 developers building decentralized applications.

Figment

Figment delivers staking-as-a-service infrastructure designed specifically for institutional asset managers, exchanges, custodians, and decentralized protocol foundations. The platform maintains active, monitored validator nodes across more than thirty leading proof-of-stake protocols, encompassing major networks such as Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, Avalanche, Near, and various Cosmos application chains. Organizations can deploy dedicated private validator nodes or direct delegations toward public enterprise clusters depending on balance size and architectural preferences.

Beyond standard bare-metal validator operations, Figment equips institutional engineering teams with developer tooling, including robust API endpoints and webhooks for automated staking, validator lifecycle tracking, and programmatic rewards harvesting. The Figment App serves as a centralized operational dashboard, offering institutional clients granular visibility into active stakes, historical reward distributions, commission deductions, and node uptime metrics across multi-chain portfolios.

For enterprise platforms embedding staking into consumer or custodial products, Figment acts as the underlying execution layer. Custody providers and financial institutions integrate Figment staking infrastructure directly into their existing custody environments without transferring control of funds, maintaining a clean technical separation between key storage and transaction validation.

Protocol commissions, gas costs, and unbonding timelines

Ankr

Using Ankr for liquid staking avoids upfront software licensing fees, but users encounter several direct and indirect protocol costs. Ankr applies a protocol fee taken as a percentage of gross staking rewards generated by underlying validators. This commission typically ranges between 5% and 10% depending on the specific network and validator ecosystem rules, with remaining rewards compounding directly into the value of the derivative token.

In addition to protocol commissions, users must pay native network gas fees for every deposit, claim, or redemption transaction initiated through their Web3 wallet. Unbonding timelines strictly adhere to the consensus rules of the target blockchain. For example, unstaking from native Ethereum or Polkadot contracts requires waiting through network-mandated unbonding queues before funds can be claimed. Alternatively, users seeking immediate exits often swap their liquid staking tokens on secondary decentralized exchanges, though this path introduces potential price discount risk and slippage relative to the underlying spot peg.

Figment

Figment utilizes a protocol commission model where fees are typically deducted directly from gross on-chain staking rewards rather than invoiced as flat monthly infrastructure costs. Standard protocol commission rates vary across supported blockchains, reflecting individual network tokenomics, hardware requirements, and custom client volume tier agreements. For dedicated institutional validator clusters, customized fee agreements or software-as-a-service infrastructure fees may apply depending on technical configuration, custom service level agreements, and support requirements.

Because Figment does not custody digital assets, all principal deposits and generated staking rewards settle directly to client-controlled wallet addresses or whitelisted institutional custody accounts according to protocol rules. Figment does not apply proprietary withdrawal charges, spread markups, or liquidity exit penalties beyond native network transaction fees and protocol commission percentages agreed in enterprise contracts.

Yield realization timelines, unbonding schedules, and payout frequencies depend strictly on the underlying network protocol mechanics. For instance, Ethereum rewards distribute on-chain according to consensus rules, while networks like Cosmos or Polkadot enforce native unbonding windows ranging from two to four weeks. Stakers must account for these native blockchain rules when modeling portfolio liquidity.

Smart contract custody, audits, and validator risks

Ankr

Ankr utilizes a non-custodial architecture where users maintain direct ownership of their private keys and connect through decentralized Web3 wallets. Staked digital assets are managed directly by smart contracts rather than centralized corporate custodians, removing intermediary counterparty insolvency exposure. Users exchange supported base assets for liquid staking derivative tokens, which continue to accrue underlying consensus rewards while remaining functional across diverse external decentralized finance applications and smart contract platforms.

Security helps protect include third-party code reviews and ongoing smart contract audits to identify potential system vulnerabilities across supported networks. Staked collateral is allocated across institutional node operators to avoid concentration with any single infrastructure entity. Even with these architectural protections, participants face inherent protocol risks, including smart contract bugs, multi-chain bridge exposures, and validator slashing penalties resulting from unexpected hardware downtime or consensus misbehavior on underlying blockchains.

Figment

Security architecture at Figment centers strictly on non-custodial operations, ensuring that clients retain full ownership and administrative control over their cryptographic private keys and staking withdrawal credentials at all times. Figment operates validation nodes and signs blocks on behalf of delegators, but never maintains access to funds or holds authorization to transfer principal assets out of client-managed custody vaults.

To mitigate technical and operational vulnerabilities, Figment maintains independent SOC 2 Type II compliance and ISO 27001 certifications covering its infrastructure management and operational workflows. Node deployment utilizes distributed cloud and bare-metal environments across diverse geographical data centers, incorporating robust hardware security modules, multi-region failover, and active anti-DDoS mitigations to sustain high validator uptime and prevent double-signing events.

Figment provides commercial slashing coverage policies for eligible institutional clients, designed to protect against potential financial losses resulting from validator downtime penalties or accidental infrastructure errors. While these operational measures significantly diminish technical failure risks, delegators still operate within the broader regulatory and software failure risks inherent to public distributed consensus protocols.

Global accessibility, governance, and support channels

Ankr

Ankr operates across public blockchain networks, enabling global access to its liquid staking pools and remote procedure call infrastructure. Because the platform relies on decentralized smart contracts, users do not complete identity verification or traditional registration processes to stake assets. Instead, participants connect compatible Web3 wallets directly to the protocol interface. Individual market participants remain responsible for understanding regional rules regarding digital asset yields, staking distributions, and decentralized token exposure within their own jurisdictions.

Protocol governance allows ANKR token holders to vote on ecosystem upgrades, validator parameters, and treasury allocations across the ecosystem. User support operates through decentralized channels rather than conventional centralized call centers. Those seeking assistance can access technical developer documentation, open community Discord channels, collaborative forums, and web ticketing forms. While these resources offer substantial guidance, response times vary and users must troubleshoot Web3 transactions independently without formal service level agreements.

Figment

Headquartered in Canada and operating globally, Figment structures its products to comply with international enterprise standards, serving hedge funds, venture funds, registered investment advisers, public companies, and global fintech institutions. The company maintains strict enterprise onboarding workflows, executing standard Know Your Customer and anti-money laundering due diligence before provisioning dedicated validator infrastructure or enterprise API services.

Customer support for enterprise clients includes dedicated technical account managers, specialized integration engineers, and around-the-clock infrastructure monitoring. Service level agreements provide intended to provide response times, proactive incident notifications, and scheduled operational reviews, catering specifically to institutional expectations that standard retail community channels cannot satisfy.

Comprehensive tax and accounting support represents a core component of the platform. Figment provides downloadable, auditable reporting tools that export reward histories, cost-basis calculations, and protocol event logs in formats compatible with major institutional crypto accounting platforms, easing quarterly financial reporting and internal audit requirements for corporate treasuries.

Protocol risks, depeg exposure, and smart contract boundaries

Ankr

Participating in liquid staking involves structural risks that differ markedly from holding spot digital assets in cold storage. The most prominent exposure is smart contract vulnerability; an exploit within Ankr contract architecture could impair the redemption mechanism of liquid tokens. Additionally, cross-chain bridges used to transfer liquid tokens across disparate networks introduce external attack vectors.

Market liquidity risk also plays a substantial role. Under stressed market conditions, liquid staking tokens traded on secondary decentralized exchanges can temporarily depeg from their native underlying asset. While protocol redemption mechanics remain defined by smart contracts, sudden liquidity crunches can create adverse pricing for users forced to sell on open markets rather than waiting through full consensus unbonding delays.

Figment

Delegating to Figment validators mitigates operational node failure risks through enterprise-grade DevOps, but it does not eliminate systemic blockchain network vulnerabilities. All proof-of-stake delegators remain exposed to smart contract bugs, sudden hard forks, and native protocol governance changes that could alter yield rates or unbonding periods. While Figment provides commercial slashing protections under qualified institutional contracts, such policies cover specific operational faults rather than market-wide asset depreciation or underlying blockchain consensus failures.

Organizations must evaluate native protocol lockup schedules and liquidity constraints before allocating balance sheet capital. Figment maintains redundant failover infrastructure and continuous monitoring to prevent validator double-signing and downtime penalties, yet market participants should account for protocol-level slashing conditions that arise from broader decentralized network events outside validator operational control.

Who it suits

Ankr

Ankr is suitable for decentralized finance users, Web3 developers, and intermediate crypto holders who want to earn staking rewards across multiple networks without running complex hardware. It appeals particularly to participants looking to retain capital efficiency by utilizing liquid staking receipts in lending protocols or liquidity pools.

It is less suitable for complete beginners who lack experience managing non-custodial Web3 wallets, or conservative investors who prefer direct native staking without layered smart contract dependencies and secondary market peg risks.

Figment

Figment is tailored for institutional market participants, including venture capital funds, corporate treasury managers, digital asset custodians, and fintech builders requiring SOC 2 compliant staking infrastructure across diversified proof-of-stake networks. It fits organizations that already maintain robust self-custody or qualified custodian accounts and require programmatic API management without surrendering custody of cryptographic keys.

Retail individuals with small token balances or users seeking high-frequency liquid staking swaps will find the direct enterprise engagement model and custom pricing structure unnecessary compared to automated consumer staking platforms.

Ankr

Ankr provides multi-chain liquid staking tokens and Web3 RPC infrastructure. Users gain cross-chain staking liquidity without managing validators, balanced against smart contract dependencies, protocol fee deductions, and decentralized governance tradeoffs across networks.

Ankr review

Figment

Figment operates enterprise-grade, non-custodial staking infrastructure across major proof-of-stake networks. It delivers SOC 2 certified validator operations, institutional reporting, and API integrations for asset managers, custodians, and fintech platforms.

Figment review

Not the right match?

Line up any two providers side by side, or browse the full list to find your next provider.