Skip to content
HodlCue

Head-to-head

2gether vs MakerDAO / Sky

2gether

European retail users who historically sought everyday euro card spending backed directly by digital token balances within a regulated cooperative mobile application.

5.20
vs
Higher editorial review rating

MakerDAO / Sky

Decentralized finance users seeking non-custodial stablecoin savings yields through USDS or crypto-backed borrowing against verified collateral without intermediaries.

8.10
  • 2gether for European retail users who historically sought everyday euro card spending backed directly by digital token balances within a regulated cooperative mobile application.; MakerDAO / Sky for Decentralized finance users seeking non-custodial stablecoin savings yields through USDS or crypto-backed borrowing against verified collateral without intermediaries..

Our take

2gether

2gether established itself as an early European cooperative fintech application aiming to merge daily point of sale spending with custodial cryptocurrency balances. The platform integrated a contactless Visa debit card, allowing cardholders across Eurozone jurisdictions to spend major cryptocurrencies without manual pre conversion. Central to the value proposition was the native 2GT token, which granted staking rewards, reduced dynamic trading spreads, and gave retail participants a cooperative stake in platform operations.

However, the business model encountered acute vulnerability during adverse market cycles. In July 2022, facing capital shortages and external market stress, 2gether terminated consumer services, instituted controversial account maintenance charges, and facilitated customer balance migrations to Spanish exchange operator Bit2Me. As a result, the platform functions primarily as a historical case study in custodial vulnerability and retail liquidity management.

MakerDAO / Sky

MakerDAO, transitioning under the Sky brand ecosystem, delivers deep decentralized financial infrastructure for collateralized debt positions and stablecoin yield accumulation. The architecture allows participants to interact directly with permissionless smart contracts, generating Sky Dollar (USDS) or legacy DAI against supported crypto collateral. Depositors can allocate funds into the Sky Savings Rate (SSR) or DAI Savings Rate (DSR) to earn programmatic returns derived from protocol stability fees and balance sheet assets.

While the non-custodial structure eliminates counterparty bankruptcy exposure associated with centralized crypto platforms, participants remain exposed to smart contract bugs, variable borrowing costs, governance decisions, and collateral liquidation triggers during market volatility. Sky suits experienced on-chain market participants who require transparent self-custody over custodial lending platforms and understand decentralized risk dynamics.

Pros and cons

2gether

Pros

  • Offered an integrated Visa debit card converting crypto balances directly to euros at point of sale terminals.
  • Provided native fee discounts and staking tiers linked to holding the cooperative 2GT utility token.
  • Maintained zero direct commission trading policies by utilizing spread pricing across major liquid tokens.

Cons

  • Halted retail services in July 2022 following severe operational pressures and market liquidity distress.
  • Subjected customer withdrawals to sudden balance retention fees and mandatory third party migration paths.
  • Relied on single provider custodial arrangements without granular user controlled multi signature key architecture.

MakerDAO / Sky

Pros

  • Non-custodial smart contracts enable direct on-chain deposits without account creation or identity checks
  • Transparent on-chain governance sets variable stability fees and savings rates via executive voting
  • Optional 1:1 conversion pathways between legacy DAI and upgraded USDS stablecoins

Cons

  • Stability fees and savings yields fluctuate continuously according to governance decisions and liquidity balances
  • Collateral positions face automatic smart contract liquidation penalties during severe market downturns
  • Ethereum mainnet transaction costs create substantial fee friction on smaller deposit or withdrawal balances

Card functionality, mobile app ecosystem, and supported assets

2gether

2gether operated as a mobile first financial ecosystem combining centralized digital asset trading with an integrated payment card. The application delivered a consumer oriented interface tailored for casual retail participants who wanted straightforward entry into digital asset markets without managing private cryptographic keys. Supported assets centered on major market capitalization tokens, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, and Basic Attention Token, alongside the proprietary 2GT utility asset.

The central feature of the ecosystem was the prepaid Visa debit card, which interfaced directly with the customer custodial cryptocurrency balances and fiat euro accounts. When cardholders initiated transactions at physical or online merchant terminals, the backend payment engine liquidated the selected digital asset into euros in real time to settle with the card network. This structure allowed seamless retail payments without requiring manual trades beforehand.

Beyond standard payment routing, the application included portfolio tracking tools, recurring buy setups, and community governance features tied to 2GT token ownership. Users could participate in informal voting rounds regarding upcoming asset listings or app improvements. While the asset catalog covered essential large cap tokens, it lacked deep secondary market coverage, specialized decentralized finance tokens, and granular order placement options like limit orders or margin facilities.

MakerDAO / Sky

Sky functions primarily as an autonomous collateralized debt protocol built natively on Ethereum and expanding across supported Layer 2 networks. The foundation of the system revolves around decentralized vaults where participants deposit eligible crypto assets, including Ether (ETH), wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC), staked Ether (stETH), and selected real-world asset allocations, to mint stablecoins. Following the protocol overhaul, participants have access to both the established DAI stablecoin and the upgraded USDS asset, alongside Maker (MKR) and Sky (SKY) governance tokens.

Depositors seeking yield allocate USDS into the Sky Savings Rate or DAI into the DAI Savings Rate module without relinquishing custody to third-party custodians. These savings modules accrue interest programmatically, pulling revenue generated from active borrowing stability fees and institutional collateral backing the balance sheet. Token holders can execute 1:1 conversions between DAI and USDS or convert MKR to SKY at a fixed 1:24,000 ratio directly through the official user interface or via decentralized exchange liquidity pools.

The system additionally introduces SubDAO structures, known as Stars, designed to decentralize specific operational tasks, regional lending markets, and customized token economics. This multi-token structure provides diverse yield pathways but demands careful tracking of token utility, contract migrations, and individual collateralization criteria across each specific vault category.

Transaction pricing, exchange spreads, and cashout costs

2gether

2gether adopted a zero explicit trading commission marketing narrative, meaning spot conversions between euro balances and digital assets did not carry visible transaction line item fees. Instead, trading expenses were incorporated into execution spreads. The backend system sourced liquidity from multiple external partner exchanges, adding a markup between 1.0 percent and 2.5 percent depending on market volatility, selected token pair liquidity, and client 2GT holding tiers.

Token utility rules allowed users who accumulated substantial amounts of 2GT to access tighter spread bands and waived monthly card management fees. Standard users who did not hold minimum staking thresholds encountered standard spread margins on buys and sells. Physical card issuance was initially free or subject to nominal delivery costs, while standard point of sale transactions in euros did not attract domestic surcharge fees.

Withdrawal costs presented notable friction points throughout the platform lifecycle. Transferring cryptocurrencies out of the app to external non custodial wallets incurred standard blockchain network fees alongside internal processing surcharges. When the company initiated shutdown procedures in 2022, management imposed an unexpected twenty euro account maintenance fee on inactive retail balances, which provoked significant client friction during the final migration and asset withdrawal period toward partnered exchange facilities.

MakerDAO / Sky

Operating on Sky involves several variable cost components rather than flat platform subscription fees. Borrowers minting USDS or DAI pay an annualized stability fee, which is a dynamic interest rate calculated continuously against the notable debt balance. Stability fees vary substantially depending on the deposited collateral type, risk profile, and broader macroeconomic liquidity targets set by DAO token governance voters. Volatile collateral assets generally carry higher stability rates than conservative multi-collateral allocations.

When a borrower's collateral value falls below the mandatory liquidation threshold, the smart contract initiates an automated Dutch auction liquidation mechanism. Liquidation penalties apply, charging borrowers a percentage fee on top of the liquidated collateral required to cover the notable stablecoin debt. These liquidation penalties range between roughly 5 percent and 15 percent depending on the specific vault parameter, making conservative over-collateralization essential for debt positions.

Depositing into the savings module does not incur native management or withdrawal fees. However, because the primary contract operations settle on the Ethereum base layer, network gas fees apply to every transaction, including token approvals, deposits, compounding claims, and withdrawals. During periods of elevated blockchain congestion, gas costs can erode net yields for smaller balance allocations, favoring larger capital deposits or Layer 2 execution routes where available.

Custodial model, platform security, and key governance

2gether

2gether functioned as a purely custodial service provider, retaining full administrative control over cryptographic keys associated with user balances. Account holders did not hold private keys, passphrases, or individual seed backups. While this model simplified mobile onboarding for non technical consumers, it concentrated balance risks entirely within the corporate infrastructure and third party institutional wallet custodians.

Platform defenses relied on standard consumer authentication controls, including biometric authentication, mandatory two factor verification via SMS or authenticator apps, and algorithmic transaction monitoring for suspicious login locations. Cryptographic balances were primarily held in cold storage systems managed by institutional partners to mitigate online attack surfaces, with only small operational floats retained in warm wallets to settle daily card payments.

The limitations of this centralized custodial structure became evident during operational disruptions. In 2020, 2gether suffered a security compromise that resulted in the theft of approximately 1.2 million euros worth of digital assets from its operational hot reserves. Although the company sought to compensate affected users through 2GT token allocations rather than immediate liquid euro distributions, the event underscored the inherent risks associated with custodial multi asset mobile apps operating without comprehensive sovereign insurance coverage.

MakerDAO / Sky

Sky operates on a non-custodial framework where assets remain locked inside audited smart contracts rather than managed by a corporate entity or pooled custodial exchange. Participants control their private keys through self-custody Web3 wallets, retaining sovereign authority over withdrawals provided their vault remains properly collateralized. The protocol does not enforce identity verification, know-your-customer checks, or account registrations to interact with the underlying open-source smart contracts.

Protocol parameters, risk limits, stability fees, and supported collateral types are governed by SKY and MKR token holders through decentralized executive voting and governance polls. To mitigate emergency exploitation vectors, the protocol uses governance security modules that implement time delays between proposal approval and contract execution. This operational buffer provides market participants with time to react, exit positions, or adjust balances if contentious parameter adjustments occur.

Despite comprehensive formal verification and numerous external security audits conducted across multiple years, self-custody smart contract systems carry inherent risks. Technical vulnerabilities, oracle pricing failures, extreme chain-level liquidations, and unexpected balance sheet composition shifts in underlying backing assets represent systemic exposures that cannot be fully eliminated by code helps protect alone.

Jurisdictional access, compliance checks, and client assistance

2gether

2gether focused its operational presence across member states of the European Economic Area, specifically targeting consumers residing within Eurozone markets such as Spain, Portugal, Italy, and France. Due to cross border financial regulations and card scheme limitations, the platform did not accept registrations from residents of the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, or high risk jurisdictions identified by international anti money laundering taskforces.

Onboarding required standard customer verification procedures in compliance with European Anti Money Laundering directives. Users submitted official identity documentation, such as national identification cards or passports, alongside live biometric facial verification and proof of residential address. Account approval was generally processed within several hours through automated verification tools, allowing newly approved users to generate virtual payment cards immediately while physical cards arrived by postal mail.

Customer support channels operated primarily through an in app ticket system, direct email assistance, and moderated social messaging channels. Response times and query resolutions were acceptable during normal operations but deteriorated significantly during market volatility spikes and security incidents. When service closure was announced in July 2022, support bandwidth was overwhelmed, leaving many users dependent on community forums and Bit2Me transition documentation to clarify balance retrieval instructions.

MakerDAO / Sky

At the foundational smart contract level, Sky remains globally accessible to any wallet connected to supported EVM-compatible networks. However, front-end access via the official sky.money web application enforces geographical terms of service restrictions. The hosted user interface blocks visitors originating from specific jurisdictions, including the United States, sanctioned territories, and restricted regions, due to evolving regulatory frameworks surrounding digital asset services.

Because Sky is a decentralized protocol rather than a traditional financial intermediary, customer support functions differ significantly from centralized financial platforms. There is no central helpdesk, phone support, or ticketing department capable of reversing errant blockchain transactions, recovering lost private keys, or modifying personal vault configurations. Users rely on community-managed forums, Discord channels, public governance documentation, and technical knowledge bases for operational guidance.

Prospective users must recognize that interacting with decentralized finance interfaces requires technical self-reliance. While alternative community front-ends and direct contract interactions exist outside the primary web portal, navigating these tools demands familiarity with Web3 wallet security, RPC network configurations, and decentralized trade routing.

Who it suits

2gether

2gether originally matched casual European cryptocurrency enthusiasts who prioritized frictionless point of sale debit card spending over advanced order execution tools or direct cryptographic custody. It provided straightforward functionality for individuals looking to use Bitcoin and major altcoins for daily retail purchases within a streamlined mobile environment.

Because the platform is no longer operational, active crypto traders, yield seekers, and everyday consumers must evaluate active, fully solvent alternatives. Those requiring robust debit card capabilities and secure custodial environments should review established regulated platforms like Bit2Me, Nexo, or Crypto.com, while security focused individuals should prioritize non custodial mobile wallets combined with decentralized exchange routing.

MakerDAO / Sky

Sky suits decentralized finance participants, DAO treasuries, and self-custodial crypto holders seeking programmatic stablecoin savings yields without custodial intermediaries. The platform also works well for experienced borrowers seeking transparent, collateralized stablecoin loans against native crypto assets. Active on-chain users benefit from holding assets across audited smart contracts governed entirely by decentralized voting. However, the system is less practical for small-balance retail depositors due to Ethereum mainnet transaction fee overhead. Users who require traditional customer support desks or regulatory deposit is intended to support will find the decentralized structure misaligned with their operational needs. Institutional and self-directed capital allocators with self-custody experience remain the primary audience for this protocol.

2gether

MakerDAO / Sky

2gether

2gether provided a mobile crypto debit card, custodial trading balances, and 2GT utility token integration for European consumers before closing operations and transferring user accounts to Bit2Me.

MakerDAO / Sky

MakerDAO, rebranded as Sky, operates non-custodial decentralized lending infrastructure. Users borrow decentralized stablecoins against crypto collateral and deposit funds into native savings modules without centralized intermediaries or custody …

Other matchups

  • Compare
  • Compare
  • Compare
  • Compare
  • Compare
  • Compare

Not the right match?

Line up any two providers side by side, or browse the full list to find your next provider.