Updated September 28, 2026 · HodlCue Editorial Team
GridPlus Lattice1 vs MetaMask
GridPlus Lattice1
MetaMask
Higher score in this comparison
Where GridPlus Lattice1 and MetaMask differ
| Compare | GridPlus Lattice1ReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives | MetaMaskReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives |
|---|---|---|
| Wallet type | Hardware | Browser |
| Price | $397 | Not confirmed |
| Secure element | bank vault chips | Not confirmed |
| Open source | Not confirmed | No |
Same on both: Custody (Self custody), Backup options (Seed).
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings. Partners with a live offer in your country come first, then every other brand by score.
Key differences
- MetaMask scores higher overall: 8.9 vs 8.5.
- Support channels: only MetaMask offers Chat.
Our verdict on each
GridPlus Lattice1
GridPlus Lattice1 is a hardware wallet for long-term holders who put device security ahead of price. Keys stay in self custody with the holder and signing runs on bank vault chips, and the $397 device is a one-off purchase with no account to manage.
MetaMask
MetaMask suits anyone who wants a free browser wallet that keeps control of their own keys, with self-custody (self custody) and a seed backup (seed) as the trade-off for convenience. It suits everyday token holding, not larger balances that need a separate device.
Score breakdown
| Area | GridPlus Lattice1 | MetaMask |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | 8.2The device costs $397 against a €69.28 median for hardware wallets, so the outlay is the weak point. | Not confirmed |
| Offer | 9.0 | 9.3Higher |
| Trust | Not confirmed | 8.7 |
How they place
| Ranking | GridPlus Lattice1 | MetaMask |
|---|---|---|
| Crypto wallets | 100 of 156 | 81 of 156 |
Every fact side by side
| Fact | GridPlus Lattice1 | MetaMask |
|---|---|---|
| Features | Self custody | Self custody |
| Legal entity | GridPlus Inc. | Consensys Software Inc. |
| Headquarters | United States | Not confirmed |
| Founded | Not confirmed | 2016 |
| Support channels | Email, Help centre, Community | Email, Chat, Help centre, CommunityCovers more |
Where each stands against the rest
| Fact | GridPlus Lattice1 | MetaMask | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $397highest quarter | Not confirmed | $0 |
Median across 45 listed providers.
Pros and cons
GridPlus Lattice1
Pros
- bank vault chips keep transaction signing on the device
- Self-custody with a seed backup puts keys with the holder
- Hardware form factor at $397 suits cold storage of larger holdings
Cons
- The device costs $397, far above the €69.28 typical for hardware wallets
- Backups use a seed, so a single written record guards the whole holding
- Support runs on email, help centre and community only
MetaMask
Pros
- Self-custody, so the keys stay with the holder (self custody)
- Help runs through email, chat and help centre
- Operated by a named company, Consensys Software Inc.
Cons
- MetaMask is not open source, so the code cannot be read by the people running it
- A browser wallet (browser) keeps the work on the same device you browse with, so Trezor's hardware approach (hardware) is the calmer choice for larger balances
- Recovery depends on a seed phrase (seed) held by the holder
Who each suits
GridPlus Lattice1
Who it suits
- Long-term holders storing coins on the device itself
- Anyone who puts bank vault chips ahead of a low price
Who should look elsewhere
- Buyers on a tight budget, who would find Trezor far cheaper at $79
- People wanting a phone app, since Bit2Me is a mobile wallet
- Users who prefer a provider holding the keys, since bynex is custodial
MetaMask
Who it suits
- People who want to hold their own keys without buying a device
- Readers who want their wallet open in a browser tab rather than an app
- Anyone comfortable storing a seed phrase (seed) somewhere safe
Who should look elsewhere
- Trezor, if you would rather keep the keys in a hardware device (hardware)
- Bit2Me, if a mobile wallet (mobile) suits you better
- bynex, if you would rather the provider held the keys (custodial)
Current offers
GridPlus Lattice1
Current offer
Discount code
GET 5% OFF YOUR NEXT PURCHASE: 5% off your next purchase
Sign up for the Crypto Security Newsletter
Source, checked September 26, 2026
MetaMask
Current offer
Bonus
Earn up to 4% with the Money Account: up to 4% APY
APY is variable and not guaranteed
Source, checked September 26, 2026
Questions about each
GridPlus Lattice1
How much does the GridPlus Lattice1 cost?+
The device is priced at $397 as a one-off purchase. That is a far bigger outlay than the €69.28 typical of hardware wallets, so the budget matters as much as the security design. There is no ongoing account fee attached to the hardware itself.
Who holds the coins on the Lattice1?+
Keys stay with the holder, and the device works in self custody. Nothing sits with a provider on your behalf, so there is no third party to ask if a seed is lost. You also cannot lean on a provider's support team to restore access, because recovery starts with your own backup.
MetaMask
Does MetaMask hold my coins for me?+
MetaMask is a self-custody wallet (self custody), and self-custody is also listed as a headline feature (self custody). The keys stay on your side rather than with a provider, so no account balance sits with the company, and recovery after losing the device is down to your own backup.
How do I back up a MetaMask wallet?+
The listed backup method is a seed (seed), a single set of words you write down and keep offline. Anyone planning to use self-custody needs a safe place to store that phrase, and looking after it is the holder's job rather than something a provider handles on your behalf.
Other options to compare
GridPlus Lattice1
MetaMask