Figment vs Hodlnaut

Figment delivers staking-as-a-service infrastructure designed specifically for institutional asset managers, exchanges, custodians, and decentralized protocol foundations. The platform maintains active, monitored validator nodes across more than thirty leading proof-of-stake protocols, encompassing major networks such as Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, Avalanche, Near, and various Cosmos application chains. Organizations can deploy dedicated private validator nodes or direct delegations toward public enterprise clusters depending on balance size and architectural preferences.

Beyond standard bare-metal validator operations, Figment equips institutional engineering teams with developer tooling, including robust API endpoints and webhooks for automated staking, validator lifecycle tracking, and programmatic rewards harvesting. The Figment App serves as a centralized operational dashboard, offering institutional clients granular visibility into active stakes, historical reward distributions, commission deductions, and node uptime metrics across multi-chain portfolios.

For enterprise platforms embedding staking into consumer or custodial products, Figment acts as the underlying execution layer. Custody providers and financial institutions integrate Figment staking infrastructure directly into their existing custody environments without transferring control of funds, maintaining a clean technical separation between key storage and transaction validation.

During its active operational span between 2019 and mid 2022, Hodlnaut operated primarily as a centralized crypto interest platform. Retail and corporate customers deposited supported digital tokens into custodial accounts to generate passive returns. The platform supported a focused roster of core assets, including Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC), and leading dollar pegged stablecoins such as USD Coin (USDC), Tether (USDT), and Dai (DAI). Yields were calculated on a compound daily basis and credited to user balances every Monday, creating an appealing user experience for passive buy and hold investors looking to maximize token accumulation over extended holding horizons without active spot trading.

Behind the customer facing interface, Hodlnaut generated returns by lending aggregated depositor balances to institutional counterparties, decentralized finance liquidity pools, and structured yield farming strategies. Unlike decentralized non custodial staking protocols where network validators secure consensus, Hodlnaut took full legal custody and discretionary control over user assets. Depositors took on unsecured creditor status, meaning their principal was directly exposed to the financial health and risk management discipline of the company. When market stress triggered institutional defaults across the lending ecosystem, this centralized rehypothecation structure proved fatal to client asset preservation.

Figment utilizes a protocol commission model where fees are typically deducted directly from gross on-chain staking rewards rather than invoiced as flat monthly infrastructure costs. Standard protocol commission rates vary across supported blockchains, reflecting individual network tokenomics, hardware requirements, and custom client volume tier agreements. For dedicated institutional validator clusters, customized fee agreements or software-as-a-service infrastructure fees may apply depending on technical configuration, custom service level agreements, and support requirements.

Because Figment does not custody digital assets, all principal deposits and generated staking rewards settle directly to client-controlled wallet addresses or whitelisted institutional custody accounts according to protocol rules. Figment does not apply proprietary withdrawal charges, spread markups, or liquidity exit penalties beyond native network transaction fees and protocol commission percentages agreed in enterprise contracts.

Yield realization timelines, unbonding schedules, and payout frequencies depend strictly on the underlying network protocol mechanics. For instance, Ethereum rewards distribute on-chain according to consensus rules, while networks like Cosmos or Polkadot enforce native unbonding windows ranging from two to four weeks. Stakers must account for these native blockchain rules when modeling portfolio liquidity.

Hodlnaut initially maintained a transparent fee structure designed to attract consistent asset inflows. The platform charged no recurring monthly management fees, no account setup costs, and no penalties for flexible account maintenance. Depositors were granted one free crypto withdrawal per calendar month across selected supported assets, helping lower overall friction for periodic rebalancing. Subsequent withdrawals incurred fixed network transaction fees that were dynamically adjusted according to prevailing blockchain congestion. The company also generated commercial revenue through embedded conversion spreads on its internal token swap module, which allowed users to switch between supported collateral assets directly within the web dashboard.

The liquidity model failed entirely in August 2022 when platform leadership suspended all outgoing withdrawals, token swaps, and deposit processing. Substantial capital had been deployed into unsecured institutional positions and algorithmic decentralized mechanisms like TerraUSD, resulting in a balance sheet deficit exceeding several hundred million dollars. When retail users initiated a wave of redemption requests during broader market panic, the platform lacked the liquid reserves necessary to satisfy obligations. User balances were frozen instantaneously, and all regular withdrawal mechanics were permanently terminated as the company entered formal legal insolvency proceedings in Singapore courts.

Security architecture at Figment centers strictly on non-custodial operations, ensuring that clients retain full ownership and administrative control over their cryptographic private keys and staking withdrawal credentials at all times. Figment operates validation nodes and signs blocks on behalf of delegators, but never maintains access to funds or holds authorization to transfer principal assets out of client-managed custody vaults.

To mitigate technical and operational vulnerabilities, Figment maintains independent SOC 2 Type II compliance and ISO 27001 certifications covering its infrastructure management and operational workflows. Node deployment utilizes distributed cloud and bare-metal environments across diverse geographical data centers, incorporating robust hardware security modules, multi-region failover, and active anti-DDoS mitigations to sustain high validator uptime and prevent double-signing events.

Figment provides commercial slashing coverage policies for eligible institutional clients, designed to protect against potential financial losses resulting from validator downtime penalties or accidental infrastructure errors. While these operational measures significantly diminish technical failure risks, delegators still operate within the broader regulatory and software failure risks inherent to public distributed consensus protocols.

From an infrastructure perspective, Hodlnaut secured its platform using institutional custody partner Fireblocks, implementing multi party computation (MPC) and multi signature authorization workflows for internal administrative movements. User accounts featured mandatory multi factor authentication, email verification steps for new withdrawal whitelisting addresses, and session management alerts. In marketing materials, the company highlighted rigorous institutional underwriting standards, conservative loan to value thresholds for corporate borrowers, and conservative risk management parameters intended to shield retail depositors from adverse market volatility.

In practice, these technical security layers could not protect depositors from foundational balance sheet mismanagement and directional credit risk. Judicial management reports revealed that the company maintained concentrated, unhedged exposures to high risk protocols and failing centralized credit entities without sufficient collateral buffers. When those external counterparties defaulted, the cryptographic protections on the wallet infrastructure proved irrelevant because the underlying digital assets were already lost off platform. The subsequent liquidation order meant that custodial assets were subordinated to the formal priority ranking of insolvency claims under Singapore winding up law.

Headquartered in Canada and operating globally, Figment structures its products to comply with international enterprise standards, serving hedge funds, venture funds, registered investment advisers, public companies, and global fintech institutions. The company maintains strict enterprise onboarding workflows, executing standard Know Your Customer and anti-money laundering due diligence before provisioning dedicated validator infrastructure or enterprise API services.

Customer support for enterprise clients includes dedicated technical account managers, specialized integration engineers, and around-the-clock infrastructure monitoring. Service level agreements provide intended to provide response times, proactive incident notifications, and scheduled operational reviews, catering specifically to institutional expectations that standard retail community channels cannot satisfy.

Comprehensive tax and accounting support represents a core component of the platform. Figment provides downloadable, auditable reporting tools that export reward histories, cost-basis calculations, and protocol event logs in formats compatible with major institutional crypto accounting platforms, easing quarterly financial reporting and internal audit requirements for corporate treasuries.

Hodlnaut operated from Singapore and originally submitted an application to the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for a Major Payment Institution licence under the Payment Services Act. This pending status allowed the entity to offer digital payment token services under temporary statutory exemption provisions while its application was assessed. However, following the suspension of client services and escalating legal turmoil in 2022, MAS officially withdrew the platform exemption status. Law enforcement agencies in Singapore subsequently initiated formal investigations into platform directors regarding potential cheating and false representation offenses related to fund exposure.

Active customer support channels, live chat widgets, and direct web ticket desks have been dismantled. Operational communication is handled exclusively through court appointed liquidators, legal notices, and official creditor portal updates. Creditors participating in the restructuring and winding up proceedings must monitor verified judicial communications from appointed liquidators to submit proofs of debt and verify entitlement claims. Traditional customer service is non existent, and prospective users cannot establish new accounts or engage with any historical platform features under any jurisdiction.

Delegating to Figment validators mitigates operational node failure risks through enterprise-grade DevOps, but it does not eliminate systemic blockchain network vulnerabilities. All proof-of-stake delegators remain exposed to smart contract bugs, sudden hard forks, and native protocol governance changes that could alter yield rates or unbonding periods. While Figment provides commercial slashing protections under qualified institutional contracts, such policies cover specific operational faults rather than market-wide asset depreciation or underlying blockchain consensus failures.

Organizations must evaluate native protocol lockup schedules and liquidity constraints before allocating balance sheet capital. Figment maintains redundant failover infrastructure and continuous monitoring to prevent validator double-signing and downtime penalties, yet market participants should account for protocol-level slashing conditions that arise from broader decentralized network events outside validator operational control.

The demise of Hodlnaut highlights the structural risks embedded in high yield centralized finance platforms. When users transfer custody of their cryptocurrency to a platform in exchange for promotional interest rates, they surrender control and become general unsecured creditors. The platform relies on continuous rehypothecation, lending depositor funds to third parties or staking them in complex smart contracts to capture a positive yield spread. If borrowers default or protocol mechanisms collapse, the platform absorbs direct balance sheet losses that immediately jeopardize depositor principal.

Traditional bank accounts in major global jurisdictions often provide statutory deposit insurance protections up to defined regulatory limits. Centralized crypto yield providers, by contrast, lack sovereign deposit is intended to support. If a lending operator becomes insolvent, recovery outcomes depend entirely on asset liquidation value, legal administrative costs, and the judicial distribution waterfall. Hodlnaut demonstrates that advertised annual percentage yields must be weighed against total balance sheet counterparty risk.