Updated October 14, 2026 · HodlCue Editorial Team

Top crypto wallets compared

156 providers, ranked on the terms we checked.

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings. Partners with a live offer in your country come first, then every other brand by score. How we rank

Top crypto wallets compared
OrderProviderScoreKey factsActions
121
Coinhako logo
CoinhakoPartner
Not rated
ReviewCompareSee alternatives
122
coinhub.mnPartner
Not rated
Support channels:
Help-centre
ReviewCompareSee alternatives
123
C24Partner
Not rated
ReviewCompareSee alternatives
124
Easy CryptoPartner
Not rated
ReviewCompareSee alternatives
125
El Dorado logo
El DoradoPartner
Not rated
Legal entity:
El Dorado Labs S.R.L.
ReviewCompareSee alternatives
126
kdxPartner
Not rated
ReviewCompareSee alternatives
127
Ledger logo
LedgerPartner
Not rated
Wallet type:
Hardware
Price:
$50 to $400
Custody:
Self custody
ReviewCompareSee alternatives
128
Luno Malaysia logo
Luno MalaysiaPartner
Not rated
Wallet type:
Mobile
Custody:
Custodial
Coins supported:
49
ReviewCompareSee alternatives
129
Mercado Bitcoin logo
Mercado BitcoinPartner
Not rated
Custody:
Custodial
Coins supported:
294
Legal entity:
Mercado Bitcoin
ReviewCompareSee alternatives
130
naka logo
nakaPartner
Not rated
ReviewCompareSee alternatives

About Top crypto wallets compared

A wallet decides who holds the keys to your crypto, and this ranking sets the 151 brands we track side by side on that and on what the account costs to run. Self-custody wallets, where only you control the keys, make up 50.5% of the field, and custodial wallets, where the provider holds them and hands you an app login instead, make up 49.5%. That single choice shapes everything else: what recovery looks like, who you call when something goes wrong, and how much you pay. The trade-off runs through the list. Self-custody wallets here are mostly free and open, but they put the burden of a correct seed phrase on you. Custodial wallets are easier to start with and often come with a card or extra features, but your coins sit with the company. We weigh cost, offer and trust, with trust carrying the most weight, and we list partners before the rest.

How we picked

Scores here use three weights: trust at 40%, cost at 35% and offer at 25%. Trust is the largest slice, so custody model, open source status, secure element certification and the legal entity behind the brand matter more than a low headline price. Cost weighs the price to start and the support options around it, and offer weighs what the account actually gives you, from coin coverage to cards. Facts come from each brand's own store, terms, support and about pages, plus its entry in the ESMA register of crypto asset service providers where one exists, so every number here is tied to a named page rather than a marketing summary. Partners are listed first, then the remaining brands by score, and each entry compares itself with the one below it so you can see the trade-off at each step.

How we rank

Our top picks

  1. Trezor3. Trezor: best for top pick

    Trezor tops this ranking because it is the only entry that pairs self-custody with hardware storage, an open source codebase and a secure element rated EAL6+. Your keys stay off the phone or computer, backup runs through a seed or Shamir split, and the device covers 8,000 coins. The cost is upfront rather than ongoing: $79 for the device, plus a usb c cable and a help centre for questions. Set against Bit2Me below, the trade is a real purchase and a slower workflow for complete control over the keys. It suits long term holders who will not touch the device daily.

    • Wallet type: Hardware
    • Price: $79
    • Custody: Self custody

    Pros

    • Custody sits with the holder: self custody, with no provider able to move the funds
    • Open source firmware, so the code can be read and checked
    • A secure element rated EAL6+ keeps signing inside the device
    • Backup options of seed and shamir cover a single seed or split shares
    • Covers 8,000 coins, above the 49 median

    Cons

    • Price of $79 leaves it towards the pricier end of the table, ranking at 103 of 120
    • Coins supported rank of 8 out of 108 trails rivals that list more
    • Support runs on help centre only, so a lost seed has no live agent to call
    • Connectivity is usb c alone, so a phone or laptop is needed for signing
  2. Nebeus8. Nebeus

    Nebeus earns its place in this ranking through breadth rather than custody. It is a custodial account with multi-currency balances, crypto and a virtual card, run by Rintral Trading SLU in ES and founded in 2014. That mix makes it a practical everyday money account for someone who wants a card balance and crypto in one place. The trade is that the provider holds the coins, so there is no seed phrase of your own, and support runs on a help centre alone. Compared with Bit2Me above, it is the more account-like of the two, while Bit2Me leans harder on crypto.

    • Yield: 15%
    • Supported assets: USDC, AVAX, AAVE, and 3 more
    • Lock-up terms: No lock-up, instant unstake

    Pros

    • Staking pays 15%, above the 7% typical of the earn group and well above bunq Crypto Spain at 8.25%
    • No lock-up, instant unstake applies, so staked coins can be unstaked straight away, unlike products that tie the balance for a set period
    • The card carries a €0 charge and a 0% currency conversion fee, and a €2,000 free ATM withdrawal allowance
    • Bank of Spain (CNMV) supervises the business, and the card is a debit card with multi currency, crypto and virtual card
    • USDC, AVAX and AAVE covers stablecoins and several large-cap tokens, a wider staking list than VaultLeap at USDC

    Cons

    • 30 listed coins sits well under the 137.5 for the earn group, so the trading list is thin
    • custodial is the model, so the platform holds the keys and readers who want a wallet of their own may prefer a self-custody setup
    • Support runs on help centre only, with no live chat or phone line listed
    • The card pays a 0% cashback rate, so everyday spending earns nothing back through it

What to look for

Who holds the keys
Custody is the fork in the road. In this ranking 50.5% of wallets are self-custody, where you control the keys and nothing depends on a company's solvency, and 49.5% are custodial, where the provider holds them. Self-custody suits anyone who will write down a seed phrase; custodial suits anyone who wants a card and a login.
Recovery options
A lost seed phrase with no backup ends the account. Seed phrases are the most common route at 82.7%, Shamir splitting is offered far less often at 5.8%, and a recovery service appears at 21.2%. Check this before you fund an account.
What it costs to start
Prices across this ranking run from €0 to €21,924.06, with a median of €0 and an upper quartile of €54. Most software wallets are free, and the money is usually in hardware you buy once or in fees a custodial provider charges later.
Coin coverage
Supported coins run from 1 to 8,000,000, with a median of 49 and an upper quartile of 383.25. A very large number can mean a long tail of thinly traded assets, so read the median before the headline.
Where you can get help
Support is where free wallets and paid providers differ most. A help centre is the most common channel here at 85.7%, email follows at 70.6%, a community forum appears at 47.9% and live chat at 40.3%. Phone support is the rarest at 18.5%.
How the money is held
For custodial providers the company behind the app matters. We record the legal entity and the country it is registered in, and where the brand appears in the ESMA register we say so. Self-custody wallets sidestep the question because the balance never sits with the operator.

Frequently asked questions

Should I choose a self-custody or custodial wallet?+

Self-custody means only you hold the keys, so a provider failure cannot touch your balance, but losing the seed phrase ends the account for good. Custodial wallets are simpler to open, often bundle a card, and put your coins with a licensed company. In this ranking 50.5% sit on the self-custody side and 49.5% on the custodial side, so the choice comes down to how much responsibility you want to hold yourself.

What does a hardware wallet do that a phone app does not?+

A hardware wallet keeps the private key inside the device and signs transactions there, so the key never sits on a phone or a computer that can be infected. That is why Trezor appears at the top of this ranking with a EAL6+ secure element and seed or Shamir backup. It costs $79 and needs a usb c cable, so it suits long term holders rather than frequent traders.

Are the free wallets in this ranking safe to use?+

Most entries here cost nothing to open, including the mobile and software wallets. What separates them is custody, not price: self-custody wallets such as Edge Wallet or Bitcoin.com Wallet keep the keys with you, while custodial accounts such as Bit2Me or bynex hold them. Free software costs nothing, but you still need a written seed phrase or a provider you trust to recover your access.

How many coins do I really need a wallet to support?+

The median wallet in this ranking supports 49 coins, and the top quartile reaches 383.25. Count how many assets you actually plan to hold rather than chasing the largest figure, because a long tail of thinly traded coins adds screen clutter without adding use. For a single asset, a focused wallet is usually easier to use.

Who can I contact when something goes wrong?+

It varies sharply. Trezor and Nebeus run a help centre only, and help centre is the same, so questions are answered in writing. Edge Wallet adds email, chat and phone, including phone support, and Bitcoin.com Wallet offers email, help centre and chat. For a custodial account the provider is the one you contact, so check its channels before you deposit.

Does an open source wallet matter?+

Open source lets anyone read the code, which removes the need to trust a claim about what the app does with your keys. Trezor and Edge Wallet are open source, and Phantom is not. That matters most for self-custody wallets, where the code is the only guarantee of how keys are handled. For a custodial wallet the trust question sits with the company instead.

Coinhako

Ready to try Coinhako?

Ranked #1 of 10.

The data behind this ranking

MetricValueSample
Median taker fee0.25 %23
Lower quartile taker fee0.1 %23
Upper quartile taker fee0.75 %23
Lowest taker fee0 %23
Highest taker fee1.49 %23
Median coins4943
Lower quartile coins2943
Upper quartile coins302.543
Lowest coins143
Highest coins15,00043
Fiat deposit: card66.7 %45
Fiat deposit: bank88.9 %45
Fiat deposit: sepa37.8 %45
Fiat deposit: ach13.3 %45
Fiat deposit: apple-pay24.4 %45
Feature: custodial42.6 %115

All data and the CSV

COCA Card

COCA Card

#1 in Top crypto wallets compared

9.4/10Visit