Skip to content
HodlCue

Head-to-head

Ankr vs Zengo

8.20
  • Supports liquid staking across diverse networks including Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, and Avalanche.
  • Issues reward-bearing liquid staking tokens that can be transferred across decentralized finance applications.
  • Integrates extensive Web3 developer infrastructure, RPC nodes, and validator network services.
vs
8.40
  • Seedless multi-party computation architecture splits key shares between the user device and secure server infrastructure.
  • Three-factor biometric recovery workflow simplifies account restoration across new mobile devices without paper backups.
  • Integrated Web3 firewall flags potential smart contract hazards and malicious approval requests prior to signing.
  • Ankr for Crypto holders and developers seeking multi-chain liquid staking receipts across networks like Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Avalanche without running dedicated validator nodes.; Zengo for Mobile crypto holders seeking non-custodial asset control without managing written seed phrases, who value biometric account recovery and layered transaction firewall protections..

See the category overview

Ankr vs Zengo
FeatureAnkrZengo
Overall rating8.208.40
Best forCrypto holders and developers seeking multi-chain liquid staking receipts across networks like Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Avalanche without running dedicated validator nodes.Mobile crypto holders seeking non-custodial asset control without managing written seed phrases, who value biometric account recovery and layered transaction firewall protections.
Primary familyliquid-stakingself-custody
Maker/taker feeNot recordedNot recorded
Supported coinsNot recordedNot recorded
KYC requiredNot recordedNot recorded

Our take

Ankr

Ankr stands out as an established multi-chain infrastructure and liquid staking provider. Founded in 2017, the protocol bridges the gap between decentralized node operations and accessible staking tokens. Instead of locking assets directly on native proof of stake blockchains where capital remains illiquid, participants receive liquid staking tokens like ankrETH or ankrBNB. These synthetic receipts automatically accrue consensus layer rewards or rebase in value while remaining usable throughout decentralized finance applications.

However, liquid staking introduces operational tradeoffs that self-custodial solo staking avoids. Users must navigate smart contract vulnerabilities, slashing exposure across distributed node operators, and protocol fee deductions deducted directly from gross returns. Ankr provides functional flexibility for active decentralized finance participants, but it requires comfort with non-custodial wallet interactions and composable smart contract risk.

Zengo

Zengo represents a distinct technical path in self-custody by replacing traditional twelve-word seed phrases with two-party multi-party computation cryptography. Instead of forcing visitors to secure handwritten passphrases, Zengo splits private key authority between a personal mobile share and a server-side co-signing share. This setup delivers practical resilience against physical theft and phishing scams targeting written backups.

The standard mobile experience offers straightforward asset transfers, basic decentralized application connectivity via WalletConnect, and automated cloud recovery. However, high-volume participants should account for variable processing spreads applied by integrated fiat gateways, alongside the recurring cost of Zengo Pro if they require biometric theft protection or legacy transfer features. For retail mobile participants seeking accessible non-custodial protection, Zengo provides a streamlined and dependable balance between technical safety and day-to-day usability.

Pros and cons

Ankr

Pros

  • Supports liquid staking across diverse networks including Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, and Avalanche.
  • Issues reward-bearing liquid staking tokens that can be transferred across decentralized finance applications.
  • Integrates extensive Web3 developer infrastructure, RPC nodes, and validator network services.

Cons

  • Deducts protocol commissions directly from gross staking rewards prior to distribution.
  • Carries inherent smart contract exposure, bridge dependencies, and potential slashing risks across multiple chains.
  • Relies on decentralized community forums and ticketing rather than dedicated retail phone support.

Zengo

Pros

  • Seedless multi-party computation architecture splits key shares between the user device and secure server infrastructure.
  • Three-factor biometric recovery workflow simplifies account restoration across new mobile devices without paper backups.
  • Integrated Web3 firewall flags potential smart contract hazards and malicious approval requests prior to signing.

Cons

  • Advanced features such as legacy transfer, Web3 firewall filters, and theft protection require a paid Zengo Pro subscription.
  • Direct fiat on-ramp purchases and token swaps rely on third-party aggregators with variable spreads and network fees.
  • Desktop workflow is limited because primary key generation and biometric recovery operate exclusively on iOS and Android.

Liquid staking architecture and supported networks

Ankr

Ankr operates as a decentralized infrastructure protocol that connects token holders with distributed validator networks. Unlike single-chain staking pools, Ankr provides liquid staking mechanisms across a diverse array of major layer 1 and layer 2 blockchains. Supported assets traditionally include Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, Avalanche, and Fantom, allowing users to deposit native tokens into designated smart contracts.

Upon depositing native assets, users receive liquid staking tokens that represent their underlying deposit plus accumulated staking yield. These tokens utilize either reward-bearing models where the redemption value increases relative to the underlying asset, or rebasing mechanics that adjust account balances periodically. Beyond retail staking interfaces, Ankr operates an extensive remote procedure call network and developer suite. This dual positioning allows the protocol to route validator traffic through its proprietary node infrastructure, maintaining operational uptime while supporting Web3 developers building decentralized applications.

Zengo

Zengo operates as a non-custodial mobile software wallet available on iOS and Android devices. Unlike conventional crypto storage applications that generate a single master private key from a BIP39 mnemonic phrase, Zengo implements threshold signatures using two-party computation. Neither Zengo nor the end user holds a complete private key in isolation. Signing a transfer requires both the client share stored in the mobile secure enclave and the server share managed within Zengo distributed cloud architecture.

In terms of network support, the platform covers primary layer one and layer two ecosystems including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, and BNB Chain, alongside hundreds of ERC20 and cross-chain tokens. Visitors can view aggregated portfolio balances, inspect token balances across supported networks, and interact with Web3 decentralized finance protocols through WalletConnect. Staking access is available for selected proof of stake assets through integrated third-party validator partners.

The interface is structured specifically for handheld mobile interaction. Onboarding takes only a few minutes, requiring an active email address, secure cloud storage backup for the encrypted client share, and a face scan biometric model. This workflow eliminates the initial barrier of recording paper passphrases, making the onboarding sequence accessible while maintaining distinct cryptographic segregation from centralized exchange custody.

Protocol commissions, gas costs, and unbonding timelines

Ankr

Using Ankr for liquid staking avoids upfront software licensing fees, but users encounter several direct and indirect protocol costs. Ankr applies a protocol fee taken as a percentage of gross staking rewards generated by underlying validators. This commission typically ranges between 5% and 10% depending on the specific network and validator ecosystem rules, with remaining rewards compounding directly into the value of the derivative token.

In addition to protocol commissions, users must pay native network gas fees for every deposit, claim, or redemption transaction initiated through their Web3 wallet. Unbonding timelines strictly adhere to the consensus rules of the target blockchain. For example, unstaking from native Ethereum or Polkadot contracts requires waiting through network-mandated unbonding queues before funds can be claimed. Alternatively, users seeking immediate exits often swap their liquid staking tokens on secondary decentralized exchanges, though this path introduces potential price discount risk and slippage relative to the underlying spot peg.

Zengo

Installing and using the core Zengo application carries no base software download fee. Standard on-chain transfers incur native blockchain network gas fees, which are determined dynamically by network congestion and paid directly to validators or miners. Zengo does not add proprietary surcharges onto standard peer-to-peer wallet transfers, allowing users to broadcast standard native transactions at transparent blockchain base rates.

Commercial charges emerge when visitors utilize integrated commercial services within the application interface. Fiat on-ramp deposits, fiat off-ramp liquidations, and instant decentralized token swaps are facilitated by third-party gateway partners such as MoonPay, Banxa, and aggregated decentralized exchange liquidity providers. These transactions incorporate liquidity spreads and processing fees that typically range between one and five percent, depending on payment method, geographic currency, and token pair liquidity.

Zengo also offers an optional paid subscription tier named Zengo Pro. Available through monthly or annual recurring billing, Zengo Pro introduces enhanced utility features including an expanded Web3 security firewall, theft protection biometric limits, legacy inheritance transfer protocols, and expedited customer support response queues. Account holders can evaluate whether these specialized helps protect justify the recurring subscription overhead based on total portfolio value and decentralized activity levels.

Smart contract custody, audits, and validator risks

Ankr

Ankr utilizes a non-custodial architecture where users maintain direct ownership of their private keys and connect through decentralized Web3 wallets. Staked digital assets are managed directly by smart contracts rather than centralized corporate custodians, removing intermediary counterparty insolvency exposure. Users exchange supported base assets for liquid staking derivative tokens, which continue to accrue underlying consensus rewards while remaining functional across diverse external decentralized finance applications and smart contract platforms.

Security helps protect include third-party code reviews and ongoing smart contract audits to identify potential system vulnerabilities across supported networks. Staked collateral is allocated across institutional node operators to avoid concentration with any single infrastructure entity. Even with these architectural protections, participants face inherent protocol risks, including smart contract bugs, multi-chain bridge exposures, and validator slashing penalties resulting from unexpected hardware downtime or consensus misbehavior on underlying blockchains.

Zengo

The security model of Zengo centers on eliminating the single point of failure inherent in traditional seed phrases. Private key generation creates two independent mathematical mathematical shares: the Personal Share located on the user smartphone and the Remote Share stored on Zengo server network. During transaction authorization, the two parties compute a valid signature collaboratively without ever revealing their individual secret mathematical shares to each other or reconstructing the full private key.

Account recovery relies on a structured three-factor authentication mechanism. If a device is lost, damaged, or replaced, the user restores access by verifying their registered email inbox, retrieving the encrypted key share stored in their personal cloud account such as Apple iCloud or Google Drive, and passing a proprietary biometric face scan. The biometric scan verifies identity against an encrypted 3D mathematical face vector generated during account creation, preventing unauthorized recovery attempts by third parties who might compromise email credentials.

For transaction monitoring, Zengo integrates a Web3 firewall called ClearSign. ClearSign classifies smart contract interactions into categorized risk tiers, alerting account holders to suspicious allowance requests, known phishing smart contracts, and unverified protocol interactions before transactions are signed. These layered helps protect provide transparent operational checks, though they function as technical risk mitigation tools rather than absolute financial is intended to support against protocol-level vulnerabilities.

Global accessibility, governance, and support channels

Ankr

Ankr operates across public blockchain networks, enabling global access to its liquid staking pools and remote procedure call infrastructure. Because the platform relies on decentralized smart contracts, users do not complete identity verification or traditional registration processes to stake assets. Instead, participants connect compatible Web3 wallets directly to the protocol interface. Individual market participants remain responsible for understanding regional rules regarding digital asset yields, staking distributions, and decentralized token exposure within their own jurisdictions.

Protocol governance allows ANKR token holders to vote on ecosystem upgrades, validator parameters, and treasury allocations across the ecosystem. User support operates through decentralized channels rather than conventional centralized call centers. Those seeking assistance can access technical developer documentation, open community Discord channels, collaborative forums, and web ticketing forms. While these resources offer substantial guidance, response times vary and users must troubleshoot Web3 transactions independently without formal service level agreements.

Zengo

Zengo distributes its mobile application globally across the Apple App Store and Google Play Store, serving individual users across most international jurisdictions. Because the core wallet software operates on a non-custodial basis without taking regulatory possession of customer funds, downloading the application and receiving native blockchain transfers does not require formal identity verification or standard Know Your Customer documentation.

Regulatory compliance requirements apply when visitors interact with integrated fiat processing gateways. Purchasing crypto using credit cards, debit cards, Apple Pay, or bank transfers triggers compliance checks managed directly by the partnering payment processors. Users in restricted jurisdictions or individuals attempting transactions above statutory thresholds may be prompted to submit government identification, proof of address, and selfie verification directly to the respective payment provider.

Customer support is accessible directly through an in-app messaging interface and email channels. Unlike many open-source wallet projects that rely exclusively on community forums, Zengo maintains a staffed technical support desk that assists with onboarding inquiries, synchronization errors, and recovery troubleshooting. Users enrolled in the Zengo Pro subscription tier receive prioritized routing within the live support queue, while free tier accounts receive assistance under standard commercial response turnaround windows.

Protocol risks, depeg exposure, and smart contract boundaries

Ankr

Participating in liquid staking involves structural risks that differ markedly from holding spot digital assets in cold storage. The most prominent exposure is smart contract vulnerability; an exploit within Ankr contract architecture could impair the redemption mechanism of liquid tokens. Additionally, cross-chain bridges used to transfer liquid tokens across disparate networks introduce external attack vectors.

Market liquidity risk also plays a substantial role. Under stressed market conditions, liquid staking tokens traded on secondary decentralized exchanges can temporarily depeg from their native underlying asset. While protocol redemption mechanics remain defined by smart contracts, sudden liquidity crunches can create adverse pricing for users forced to sell on open markets rather than waiting through full consensus unbonding delays.

Zengo

To mitigate vendor dependency risk, Zengo incorporates a designated open-source recovery protocol designed to maintain continuity under unexpected operational disruptions. If Zengo servers ever cease operations or become permanently unavailable, an automated escrow mechanism releases the server-side recovery coordinates to an independent third-party code repository. This allows account holders to combine their personal cloud backup share with the released server data to reconstruct standard private keys and retrieve their assets independently of Zengo active infrastructure. Users maintain ownership of their personal share, which is stored in encrypted cloud accounts and unlocked through biometric verification. Because the multi-party computation model divides signing duties between separate mathematical components, no single party holds full operational keys during routine transactions, establishing balanced protection against single points of failure.

Who it suits

Ankr

Ankr is suitable for decentralized finance users, Web3 developers, and intermediate crypto holders who want to earn staking rewards across multiple networks without running complex hardware. It appeals particularly to participants looking to retain capital efficiency by utilizing liquid staking receipts in lending protocols or liquidity pools.

It is less suitable for complete beginners who lack experience managing non-custodial Web3 wallets, or conservative investors who prefer direct native staking without layered smart contract dependencies and secondary market peg risks.

Zengo

Zengo is particularly suited for crypto holders who want complete self custody of their digital assets but feel uncomfortable managing physical seed phrases or private key paper backups. It fits mobile first retail users who value biometric account recovery and integrated decentralized application connectivity. Individuals who prioritize distributed key security without managing complex recovery sheets will find the architecture practical. The wallet also accommodates users who desire automated legacy transfer tools and extra transaction verification rules through optional subscriptions. However, it is less suited for active high frequency traders who rely on specialized desktop order routing terminals. It is also less optimal for users seeking custom local node RPC integrations or hardware device coordination.

Ankr

Ankr provides multi-chain liquid staking tokens and Web3 RPC infrastructure. Users gain cross-chain staking liquidity without managing validators, balanced against smart contract dependencies, protocol fee deductions, and decentralized governance tradeoffs across networks.

Ankr review

Zengo

Zengo delivers seedless self custody using multi-party computation and facial biometrics across major blockchains. Our onboarding review breaks down Zengo Pro subscription costs, third-party payment integration fees, recovery mechanics, and practical asset support.

Zengo review

Not the right match?

Line up any two providers side by side, or browse the full list to find your next provider.