Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed) vs ether.fi - HodlCue
HodlCue

Provider comparison

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed) vs ether.fi

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed) vs ether.fi: compare risk grade, apy, fees, regulation, and custody in one head-to-head table.

CE

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed)

Once leading crypto earn platforms, Celsius, BlockFi, and Voyager collapsed due to risky lending and lack of …

VS
ether.fi

ether.fi

ether.fi is a decentralized platform that lets users earn rewards through liquid staking and restaking. It of…

Head-to-head comparison

Risk grade

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed)

ether.fi

BBB

APY

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed)

ether.fi

eETH base ETH staking ~3% + restaking/AVS rewards + points (variable, directional); effective yield uncertain and partly points-denominated

Base vs max rate

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed)

ether.fi

Base staking rate is modest; 'max' comes from restaking rewards + speculative points/airdrop value (not guaranteed cash yield)

Assets

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed)

ether.fi

ETH (eETH/weETH); Cash card spends against staked ETH

Lock-up / unbonding

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed)

ether.fi

eETH/weETH liquid; unstake subject to withdrawal queue

Custody

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed)

ether.fi

Non-custodial; ADDED risk layer: EigenLayer restaking exposes stake to AVS slashing conditions beyond base ETH slashing

Liquid-staking token

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed)

ether.fi

eETH / weETH (liquid restaking token)

Payout frequency

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed)

ether.fi

Continuous accrual + periodic points

US access

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed)

ether.fi

Yes for staking (permissionless); Cash card availability varies

Pros & cons

CE

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed)

Pros

  • Offered high yields on crypto deposits
  • User-friendly apps and interfaces
  • Provided passive income opportunities
  • Popularized crypto savings products

Cons

  • Custodial control meant users lost funds
  • Lack of transparency on reserves and lending
  • Excessive risk-taking led to insolvency
  • Withdrawal freezes during market stress
ether.fi

ether.fi

Pros

  • Non-custodial platform ensures user control
  • Liquid staking provides flexibility and liquidity
  • Restaking feature enables extra yield opportunities
  • Easy to use for both beginners and advanced users
  • Transparent smart contract operations

Cons

  • Smart contract risk inherent in DeFi protocols
  • Potential de-pegging of liquid token eETH
  • Restaking adds complexity and slashing risk
CE

Celsius / BlockFi / Voyager (collapsed)

Once leading crypto earn platforms, Celsius, BlockFi, and Voyager collapsed due to risky lending and lack of transparency. This review examines what went wrong and how to choose safer earn products.

ether.fi

ether.fi

ether.fi is a decentralized platform that lets users earn rewards through liquid staking and restaking. It offers a non-custodial way to participate in Ethereum staking while maintaining liquidity.

Risk warning: Cryptocurrency is a volatile, high-risk asset class. Prices can fall as well as rise, and you could lose some or all of the money you put in. Custodial providers carry counterparty risk; self-custody puts key security entirely on you. This page is general information, not financial advice.

Not the right match?

Line up any two providers side by side, or browse the full list to find your next platform.